Many structured argumentation approaches proceed by constructing a Dung-style argumentation framework (AF) corresponding to a given knowledge base. While a main strength of AFs is their simplicity, instantiating a knowledge base oftentimes requires exponentially many arguments or additional functions in order to establish the connection. In this paper we make use of more expressive argumentation formalisms. We provide several novel translations by utilizing claim-augmented AFs (CAFs) and AFs with collective attacks (SETAFs). We use these frameworks to translate assumption-based argumentation (ABA) frameworks as well as logic programs (LPs) into the realm of graph-based argumentation.
Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications
Tags
Zitieren Sie diese Publikation
Mehr Zitationsstile
- bitte auswählen -
%0 Book Section
%1 Konig2022-dx
%A König, Matthias
%A Rapberger, Anna
%A Ulbricht, Markus
%B Computational Models of Argument
%D 2022
%I IOS Press
%K
%T Just a Matter of Perspective
%X Many structured argumentation approaches proceed by constructing a Dung-style argumentation framework (AF) corresponding to a given knowledge base. While a main strength of AFs is their simplicity, instantiating a knowledge base oftentimes requires exponentially many arguments or additional functions in order to establish the connection. In this paper we make use of more expressive argumentation formalisms. We provide several novel translations by utilizing claim-augmented AFs (CAFs) and AFs with collective attacks (SETAFs). We use these frameworks to translate assumption-based argumentation (ABA) frameworks as well as logic programs (LPs) into the realm of graph-based argumentation.
@incollection{Konig2022-dx,
abstract = {Many structured argumentation approaches proceed by constructing a Dung-style argumentation framework (AF) corresponding to a given knowledge base. While a main strength of AFs is their simplicity, instantiating a knowledge base oftentimes requires exponentially many arguments or additional functions in order to establish the connection. In this paper we make use of more expressive argumentation formalisms. We provide several novel translations by utilizing claim-augmented AFs (CAFs) and AFs with collective attacks (SETAFs). We use these frameworks to translate assumption-based argumentation (ABA) frameworks as well as logic programs (LPs) into the realm of graph-based argumentation.},
added-at = {2024-09-10T11:56:37.000+0200},
author = {K{\"o}nig, Matthias and Rapberger, Anna and Ulbricht, Markus},
biburl = {https://puma.scadsai.uni-leipzig.de/bibtex/2003427cbeed8ae9198f48677d7d290e7/scadsfct},
booktitle = {Computational Models of Argument},
interhash = {d052f44f6f9bb13f716f43bf79241716},
intrahash = {003427cbeed8ae9198f48677d7d290e7},
keywords = {},
month = sep,
publisher = {IOS Press},
series = {Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications},
timestamp = {2024-09-10T15:15:57.000+0200},
title = {Just a Matter of Perspective},
year = 2022
}
