Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that hyperspectral imaging (HSI) combined with neural networks can detect colorectal cancer. Usually, different pre-processing techniques (e.g., wavelength selection and scaling, smoothing, denoising) are analyzed in detail to achieve a well-trained network. The impact of post-processing was studied less. METHODS: We tested the following methods: (1) Two pre-processing techniques (Standardization and Normalization), with (2) Two 3D-CNN models: Inception-based and RemoteSensing (RS)-based, with (3) Two post-processing algorithms based on median filter: one applies a median filter to a raw predictions map, the other applies the filter to the predictions map after adopting a discrimination threshold. These approaches were evaluated on a dataset that contains ex vivo hyperspectral (HS) colorectal cancer records of 56 patients. RESULTS: (1) Inception-based models perform better than RS-based, with the best results being 92\% sensitivity and 94\% specificity; (2) Inception-based models perform better with Normalization, RS-based with Standardization; (3) Our outcomes show that the post-processing step improves sensitivity and specificity by 6.6\% in total. It was also found that both post-processing algorithms have the same effect, and this behavior was explained. CONCLUSION: HSI combined with tissue classification algorithms is a promising diagnostic approach whose performance can be additionally improved by the application of the right combination of pre- and post-processing.
Users
Please
log in to take part in the discussion (add own reviews or comments).